To the Therapist That Comes After Me


Most of us pediatric therapists work with children that have profound, life-long challenges. Sure, we have those patients that come in for a few months, make great progress, and get discharged – never to be seen again. But those are few and far between. (And seem to be fewer and father between now a days.) We build relationships, we get attached, and we work hard to enrich every aspect of a child’s life. There’s really no avoiding it. (Unless you are made of stone, you monster!)

But that also means things get messy. Lines blur and melt together, which is why it’s so much more than a job. It’s why we burn out, why we cry, and why we find ourselves searching for something else on those really tough days. We might end up moving, changing jobs, or just starting a family. And for those reasons, we might be “replaced” by another therapist.

Having been on both sides of that situation I can tell you, I’m not sure it’s fun either way. So here’s what I’d like to say to the therapist that follows me, and what I’d like to hear as the therapist that follows behind.

-I hope you get to make a connection just as strong as mine was.

Ok, well sort of. This is one of those things that I’d like to hear someone say to me, and is harder for me to say to someone else. Who doesn’t want to hear that they were the “best”? But on the flip side, when you are the therapist following someone else, you just want your chance to shine. With that being said, I hope that you get to chat comfortably, learn about a child’s life, and be welcomed as an important part of a child’s family.

-I hope you hear about me every once and a while, but not too much.

Miss “So-and-so” would always do ____. But, Miss “So-and-so” really wanted her to work on _____. Is that what Miss “So-and-so” would have done?

Yes, it’s annoying to hear what another therapist did while you are trying to do your thing. And it’s hard to try to be someone else when you just have to be true to the way you treat. I would want a family to appreciate and understand what I had done for their child, but also allow another therapist to show who they are and what they can do.

Plus, on the flip side, I hope the family doesn’t speak about their old therapist in a negative tone, either. It’s super awkward when you are the following therapist that hears everything the parent didn’t like about their old OT. It’s a pretty big red flag that they’ll be looking for things to criticize in you, or at the very least, make you feel like you have to avoid any potential similarities you may have with the old therapist.

-I hope you don’t try to prove me wrong, or criticize what I’ve done.

Haven’t you ever found yourself in one of those OT pissing contests with another therapist? Oh, you aren’t certified in Therapeutic Listening? Wait, you don’t precisely adhere to Jean Ayres’ methodology? Haven’t you extensively studied reflex integration yet? It’s exhausting. Why do we do this to each other?

I think/hope it comes from a place of wanting to help a child and family, but it mostly comes off as this crazy OT ego battle. We are probably all guilty of looking at someone else’s paperwork and saying, “Why in the world did they do THAT?” With that being said, you can carve out your own treatment plan in a way that doesn’t minimize or belittle someone else’s work.

-I hope you are given a chance to try your own way.

Come on, OT is a journey with about a million different pathways. My way and your way might not match, but it doesn’t mean one is better than the other. Another therapist is a whole new set of eyes, and a completely different perspective. Sometimes, when you’ve been seeing a child for YEARS, it’s nice to have a fresh set of eyes.

Besides, we all spend our time studying different aspects of our profession, and we bring unique skill sets to the table. When you get a new child on your caseload, you might see something that someone else didn’t, or at least try a new way that might bring even the smallest amount of change. I hope you never feel like you are stuck in someone else’s plan, because no one wins in that scenario.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Is Handwriting Dead?


I sat across from a set of parents at an IEP meeting. Nice people- no horror stories of anger, frustration, or possible litigation. Just an average conversation about a child I recently began working with in a school setting.
My responsibility was to take over the goals of a previous OT, you know the ones that have like 7-8 different goals nestled into one frustrating, difficult to track run-on sentence? Yeah, we’re all guilty of that at some point. Regardless, the conversation was all about handwriting.
The father, quiet and reserved for the most part of the meeting, speaks up to say, “but is handwriting really a necessary skill in this day and age?”

You know how I love skeptics, but this general question is coming up more and more in my practice:

“Is handwriting really a necessary skill?”  -Goodness, yes.

“Do we really need to know how to write legibly?” -Holy cow, yes.

I’m not oblivious to the fact that our world is increasingly digital. Even the act of printing things out- who does that anymore? Almost everything is online, digital, and right at your decreasingly dexterous fingertips.
And while this is all fantastic and convenient, you can’t deny the impact of this sort of technology on kids’ developing brains. While that’s a whole other can of worms, I would just like to mention that many kids are missing out on developing a very specific and important skill set that comes along with writing.

With that being said, I urge you to look at the SKILL of handwriting over the concept of writing itself: (Hint – It’s chock-full of goodness.)

Handwriting Requires:

-Fine motor skills: Dexterity, Precision, Coordination, Grasping

-Visual motor/Oculomotor skills: Eye teaming, Convergence, Scanning

-Behavioral skills: Attention, Focus, Creativity

And that’s just scratching the surface. Yes, I know there are alternatives out there for children that can’t quite find a functional written form of communication, and that’s wonderful. But does that mean we throw out the rest? Should we pretend that handwriting never happened because something else is more convenient? Ok, I’m not THAT old, but I’m sounding like my great grandparents here.

So here’s my public service announcement: Please don’t overlook the process of handwriting and what that means for a child’s development.

Writing can be both a representation of necessary skill mastery (i.e. a proper grasp = able to button a shirt, tie shoes, or open containers to prepare a meal).
OR, it can be a window into underlying delays in skill development (i.e. poor handwriting can reveal visual motor integration issues, vision issues, behavioral/emotional issues, etc.).

If handwriting is dying, then let’s revive it. At least advocate for its existence. Don’t pull the plug, because I’m afraid of a society that doesn’t know how to write.

P.S. Please pretend you didn’t just read this typed out post on an electronic device…

Posted in Occupational Therapy | 12 Comments

Is Occupational Therapy Really a “Top Job of 2014”?

Occupational Therapy Top Job 2014 recently came out with its top jobs of 2014. (See the article here.) This year “occupational therapist” is ranked #9. So, we’re awesome, right? Hey, it’s hard not to pat yourself on the back for your career choice when you see how cool you are. However, when you look at their criteria for ranking jobs, how does OT truly measure up? Let’s take a gander into some of the factors they looked at.

Before we dive in, I should establish that yes, I do love my field. Have I ever had a second thought about my career choice? Ooooh yeah baby. And dare I say, who hasn’t? They didn’t get that phrase “the grass is always greener…” from people that were always content with what was in front of them. Regardless, there are a few things I get to say from my position that others might not. So here I go.

From my research, there appear to be 4 “key factors” in’s rating of jobs. I’ll break them down for you.


I suppose this means work environment. Now, I’m only taking pediatric occupational therapy into consideration here, so don’t jump on me in regards to other settings.

For the most part, if you are working in an adorable little private therapy gym as an outpatient or inpatient therapist, you’ve got it great! Aside from sweating your face off when you are in an A/C battle with the speech therapists in your office, it’s a pretty comfortable environment. I can even get over the fact that I lift a few heavy kids and a bunch of 25 pound swings over my head about 50 times a day. So yeah, it’s pretty cushy.

However, did they realize that some crazy high percentage of pediatric OT’s are female? Phew, talk about stressful work environment. Passive aggressive notes about washing your dishes, anyone?

Ok, no, that’s still not that terrible. However, what about therapists that work in the homes of children? I have been in some pretty scary environments doing this job.
I had moments when I had to accept the fact that my car may or may not still be outside the house when I was done with the session. I had people attempt to siphon gas from my car. I got to the point where I really tried to stop freaking out when giant bugs or spiders crawled across the room, or even when I would stand up to find actual grease stains on my scrubs from kneeling on the carpet. Or what about the poop on the floor? I’ll say that again. Poop. On the floor. Maybe those Career Cast rankers want to ride along on some of those adventures.

Also, don’t forget to fill any of these previously mentioned environments with children that might have severe behavioral issues (including but not limited to: spitting, kicking, pinching, scratching, and punching) I might spend an hour session with someone literally screaming in my ear for 60 minutes. Not to mention siblings that might not be properly supervised tearing apart the room.
But on the flip side, sometimes I have little kids cracking me up with their adorable-ness, or just saying sweet things like, “I love playing here!” Now thats pretty darn amazing. Maybe that tips the scales a little… or a lot.


This has to be a pretty big factor here, and I can’t blame anyone for looking at this aspect of a career closely. We all gotta pay our bills (and those nasty student loans). But the average salary they posted for an occupational therapist was $75,400. Where can I sign up for that job in my field?

Ok, since they are including all practice settings of occupational therapy, there are some people here that are weighing down the average. Typically, a pediatric OT makes about 30% or so less than in other settings. (I just guestimated that number, don’t hold me to it.) However, yes, you can make some pretty good money as a therapist. I even turned down (TURNED DOWN!) a job as a new grad in a nursing home for $80,000. I almost salivated at the offer. But why turn it down? For the most part, those jobs that pay really well come with their own price. Either the setting isn’t the greatest (This was a nursing home that was not well taken care of, and it showed), or the location itself isn’t the greatest. Anyone up for a pit stop in rural South Dakota? (No offense to SD, of course.)

So yes, even as a pediatric therapist I do feel like I make a decent salary. However, when I’m getting kicked or scratched on a sometimes daily basis, it might not quite feel like enough.


The job outlook for our profession is great. I usually get a call or email at least once a day from a recruiter looking to fill open positions. However, these jobs are pretty much never near where I actually want to work. If you have no commitments and want to travel around, you could very easily do that. Plus if it came down the the worst possible scenario, I know I could move somewhere and easily find a job.

Compare that outlook to my husband who spent 7 months unsuccessfully looking for a job in his field. Now that’s scary. But remember what I mentioned before, those jobs with the nicest paychecks usually have some sort of catch to them.

You also have to consider that with all the “great outlook” and “top job” postings that OT has received in the media, there has been a huge outpouring of new graduates. They are freaking everywhere! While the need continues to rise for OT services, I can’t help but feel that the tables will eventually turn. I’ve already had my look at a few very heavily saturated markets that were extremely difficult to get a job in. So yes there is availability, but it depends on your flexibility.


Oh goodness. Who was it that said occupational therapy was low stress? Let me at ‘em. Now I know stress has a lot of different meanings, and for this article, they mentioned different types including high risk situations and tough deadlines. I don’t know about my fellow OTs, but this job can be incredibly stressful at times.

I’ve got kids that are screaming, parents with various demands and requests that I need to juggle, a high productivity expectation from my boss that just never seems to happen, as well as deadlines for paperwork that influence insurance coverage and essentially if treatment will be continued. I am scheduled with back to back sessions without a break to even go to the bathroom, and yet I need to write several 4 page narrative evaluations so that parents can understand what in the world OT actually is, and hopefully so insurance might actually pay for it.

There is emotional stress for challenging patient and family situations, as well as physical stress of lifting, assisting, or transferring children all day. If you don’t leave completely exhausted at the end of the day, you probably did something wrong.
Am I saying that my job is as stressful as say, some wall street trader? No. All I’m saying is that there are a lot of hidden stressors that people take for granted or overlook.

And yes it is fair to say that among all of this stress, there is a lot of fun to be had. We play, we are creative, and we try to help people change their lives. It can be incredible, but you can’t avoid the whole package.

So what can I say? This job does have its incredible satisfactions of goals achieved. My colleague and I were talking one day, and we decided that there seems to be just enough of those little “wins” throughout the week to get you through. Even when someone just isn’t making progress, or if a parent doesn’t really care about services, there might be that one child that does something amazing that you taught them, and you just can’t beat that.

All venting aside, OT is absolutely a great career. Our world isn’t always rainbows and roses though.  It’s sweat, occasional tears, and a whole lot of heart. I’d say we deserve to hang out on that top job list.

Posted in Insider Information, Lessons Learned, Occupational Therapy | Tagged | 19 Comments

What’s a “Co-treat” All About?

What's a co-treat all about?

It’s a habit we are all guilty of as therapists. We throw around these words that parents don’t always understand, and then barely have the time to accurately explain ourselves. A disconnect can emerge in this process, with opportunities missed due to misconceptions or misunderstandings. One of these concepts that often gets caught in the jumble is something called a “co-treat.”

This term is short for “co-treatment”, or when more than one discipline works with a child at the same time. Could be physical therapy and speech therapy, or occupational therapy and speech therapy. I’ve even seen occupational therapy and physical therapy done together.

A parent’s typical first thought  when they hear that their child “would be good for a co-treat”  is usually something along these lines:

“That doesn’t seem fair!”

“They would be cheated out of therapy time!”

“That just means you both do half of a job, right?”

Ok, ok, hold on to those thoughts, because yes, sometimes a co-treat isn’t appropriate, and many times it isn’t done well. However, there are a lot of good things about a co-treat that are often lost in an immediate rejection of the idea. I hate feeling like I’m trying to give parents an up-sale to the heated leather seats and moon roof of therapy services. So let’s first look at a few reasons why a co-treat might be recommended.

Why co-treats are recommended.

When one discipline compliments another.
I put this one first because it’s pretty much the only good reason to recommend a co-treat. You want to be able to say that two services together were truly better than each one apart. (Wow, that totally sounds like a line from some cheesy therapy romance …) I promise you, in many situations it is the best option for a child’s progress. Allow me to give you an example:

Say you have a child with severe sensory processing issues. Most of the time, the speech therapist can’t get anything out of them unless they are engaged in a sensory activity. As much as we OT’s try to give them suggestions for their sessions, there is nothing like being there to help the child’s nervous system adapt on the spot.

In this scenario, the child might do a language activity as they go back and forth in a tunnel. They might use functional language to request ideal sensory strategies. They might become so organized within the session that they are able to show a whole new skill set. Both therapists are working together to achieve their goals simultaneously, with one discipline promoting another. It’s a beautiful thing when it’s done well.

When a child has specific behaviors that impede therapy.
There have been times when a child has had violent outbursts or severe behaviors that require a few extra hands. Neither therapist may feel comfortable with the idea of treating the child alone, so they ask for a co-treat. Since the idea behind it isn’t necessarily to meld two therapies together, I don’t really recommend this one. If the behavior is so bad that a therapist needs another hand, I would recommend a behaviorist or other specialist be involved in the case to address the root of the issue.

When time constraints limit therapy time.
Sometimes parents just don’t have the time to get a child every service that is recommended. And yes, it happens when parents aren’t that interested or invested in therapy, and they might only willing to do services if they are together, or within a tiny time frame. So if that parent only has an hour a week, sometimes it is better to get two services at the same time rather than just one. In this situation a co-treat might not be ideal because the child probably isn’t a great candidate to work on two skills simultaneously. However, it still happens when therapists are desperate to get the child what they need in a short amount of time.

And yes, on the more depressing and less ethical flip side of that, sometimes a clinic might recommend a co-treat for the wrong reason of billing for more services in a short period of time. I’d like to think that this rarely happens, but eh, who knows anymore.

The logistics of a co-treat.

The billing stuff:
I’m not going to go in depth about billing procedures, because I might get myself in trouble since I’m not quite certain of how procedures may vary from state to state. However, I can tell you that I’ve seen it done one of two ways.

-Sometimes services are billed completely separate as if they occurred at two different times.
-Sometimes the therapists split the time that they treated the child. (i.e. it’s an hour co-treat, so each discipline only bills a half an hour).

In my opinion, I’m not quite sure how two people can bill for the same time that they are with a child. (Even if they were pretty amazing at it and were always working on their goals.) However, It definitely depends on the policies of the insurance they are billing, because some insurances even have limitations for the number of services a child can receive in a day.

Parents, it would be up to you to double check your policies and make sure that it is being billed properly. Don’t be “double billed” for time that shouldn’t be happening. However, if the clinic you attend only deals with private pay situations, they can pretty much make you pay anything they want. Regardless, it’s worth looking into the billing procedures.

The ethical stuff:
Watch out, because often a co-treat is done WRONG. When it is done well, it is not simply a “my turn – your turn” back and forth with activities of a different focus. This sort of set-up drives me crazy. A co-treat should be an integration of both disciplines working together.

As I mentioned earlier, if the speech therapist has cards they are working on, instead of having them do an OT motor activity, then sitting for 10 minutes to do cards, integrate the cards into a motor activity! Hop on them, bring them back on a scooter board, bring them through a tunnel. Both people should be actively working on goals at the same time.

Also, it seems weird to point this out, but I hear it all the time. No, I can’t just “do PT” or “do speech” with a child too. We each have individualized training and licenses that permit us to complete a certain set of interventions. Even though we may often overlap in many areas, I can never claim to be anything other than an OT.

The benefits of a (well done) co-treat.

Sometimes incorporating two therapy services together can be magic. The child might enjoy and participate more in the session when both are working together. Sorry to my speech friends, but sometimes just being in the OT gym or incorporating OT tasks can make some of their speech activities more exciting and/or motivating. Also, I love the idea of knowing what the child’s speech goals are so I can hold the child to an appropriate set of standards when I am communicating with them.

Honestly, sometimes just having the time to talk and collaborate with another professional yields ideas that you never would have thought of alone. I’ve seen some co-treat gold that never would have happened without two people working together. And yes, sometimes individually you might not have a stellar session with a child, but with another professional at the helm as well, it might just come together.

Even if you are strongly against this concept as a parent, if your therapists recommended it, maybe try it at least once to see how it works. I’ve been so frustrated when a parent immediately shuts down the idea without even hearing us out or giving it a try.

If you see a synergy and progress that you didn’t see before, then you’ll know it was worth the test. If you see a lazy back and forth, then hey, at least you know that too. Also, even if it seems to be a good idea, but doesn’t sit well with you for every session, ask to try it once a month or so, just to touch base and see how things progress.

Just like in all therapy, there is a little bit of art thrown into the science. And a well orchestrated co-treat is just that, art. If you have two therapists that can do it well, you might be pleasantly surprised by the results.

Posted in Insider Information, Therapy Process | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

How “Evidence-Based” is Your Therapy?

Evidence Based PracticeTherapy lives, breathes, and dies by one simple phrase: “evidence based practice.”

Those three words encompass all therapeutic disciplines, from pediatrics to geriatrics. In the simplest of terms, it means that the decisions we make as clinicians must be founded in research. The kind of stuff that makes families willing to shell out their hard earned money on co-pays, or that prompts insurance companies to reimburse for all that hard work we have done. This is how each of our professional organizations fight for us to prove that we provide services that work. Services that make us better than some untrained, unskilled person off the street.

So yes, you get it already. Evidence based practice is important. Now, all you therapists out there, I need you to think about your daily treatment sessions. Is it fair to say that at least some of what you do is “because you’ve always done it that way” ? Did you pick something up from someone, who picked it up from someone else, who maybe went to a course a long time ago? Are you working off of anecdotal evidence that just kind of “makes sense”? Of course; it happens all the time. You probably just don’t sit there and question everything you are doing, especially if your clients are making progress and meeting goals. The beauty of being a clinician is that you can use your clinical reasoning to work through many problems. But what about when you are stuck and frustrated because your clients are plateauing, or you just aren’t sure where to go next. Is there something you might be missing?

In an ideal world, we would all be reading and contributing to the latest research, sharpening our skills and staying on the edge of what’s next. However, anyone that’s out there practicing knows that this isn’t always possible. There are many factors that impact our consistent use of evidence based practice in therapy.

Availability and Access to Research:

It would be wimpy of me to just whine that there isn’t enough research out there, because that’s not entirely true. What is true is that we don’t all have access to the latest research. In graduate school, they allow students access to databases that house tons of full research articles. If I tried looking something up now, I would most likely have to pay to get the full article. Yeah, I’m probably not going to do that.

This is why I think it’s nice to have a student at a facility, because as a part of their fieldwork, they typically have to complete a project about whatever their instructor decides upon. This is a great opportunity to breathe some fresh evidence based practice into your clinic or practice setting.

Also, don’t knock those new graduates that are so bright-eyed and bushy-tailed. They probably hold a lot of the latest information due to the fact that they just spent so much time in school scouring research papers for their thesis projects.


I can’t avoid the other obvious here, who really wants to go home from a long, hard day at work and read through tedious research articles? Those things aren’t meant to be thrillers. Don’t blame me if I just want to read a trashy magazine or the latest vampire romance novel. Therapists often struggle to find a work/life balance, and I’ll let you know, most business aren’t going to provide the opportunity to peruse research articles on company time. That’s for billing patient contact hours, people.

Now, the obvious solution to this issue is continuing education. We are all required to complete a certain amount of hours in order to keep our licenses. The problem here? Courses are expensive. I could spend anywhere from a couple hundred to a couple thousand dollars on a course. On top of that, you often have to use vacation time or your weekends to complete these courses, and might even have to travel far away for a course that’s any good. The cheaper courses are sometimes a joke or a complete waste of your time…pretty much a crap shoot. Plus, you may only complete 1 or 2 courses a year; not nearly enough to keep up with an ever-changing caseload.

Personal interpretation of research:

You have to let the research guide your clinical decisions, and interpret it with a critical eye. Look for the limitations and how they apply to your practice setting. Let’s say that one study found that pencil grasps do not ultimately impact handwriting legibility. Does it mean that you should never look at a child’s grasp again? No; it means that you weigh the impact of the grasp on a particular child’s handwriting and determine if it is worth changing (i.e. biomechanical joint stress, weakness, etc). Just reading the articles isn’t going to change your practice unless you interpret it and learn how to incorporate it in your day to day treatment.

Therapist personality types:

I find it interesting that in my time as an OT, I have met many different types of therapists. Some that are flighty, doing a few activities here, a few activities there, without a real “plan” in place. I’ve met people that are insanely rigid in their practice, OT rock stars that are quoting AOTA framework and ICF models. (Yes, these people often track me down on the website and let me know what I’ve been doing “wrong”.) Yikes.

These different personality types are ultimately going to contribute to the therapy they provide. Remember that whole “therapeutic use of self” thing? We can’t change who we are and how we naturally go about solving problems, but we can always try to improve.

So I guess it’s a pretty fair to say that we can never know it all. We really just have to do the best with what we have available to us. Also, we should never be afraid to ask questions and collaborate with those around us.
After saying all of this, am I going to go out and create some ground breaking research? Sadly, probably not. However, I am going to continue to try my best to make sure I can always back up what I’m doing. Stop yourself during a session and think, “Why am I doing this?” In your mind you might think: We are working on proximal stability as well as development of the palmar arches, all while addressing letter memory and sequencing. Bam! Skilled intervention!

Posted in Lessons Learned, Occupational Therapy | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments

The OTR/COTA Relationship

The OTR / COTA RelationshipWhen your child receives occupational therapy, their therapist could either be an Occupational Therapist (OTR) or an Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA).

First, I would direct you to review my post: “A Who’s Who of Occupational Therapy” so that you get a firm idea of the exact differences between these two therapists as far as credentials and job expectations.

Basically, when a COTA is treating a client, the OTR and COTA must work together to create an optimal treatment plan for a child. In the end, the OTR is in charge of supervising and signing off on the COTA’s work. This supervisory relationship can be great, indifferent, or just really, really bad.

Here are some of the issues that influence the OTR/COTA relationship in a negative way:

 -A Duel of Education Versus Years of Experience
So technically, insurance reimburses the same amount of money for a COTA or OTR completing a therapy session. If that’s the case then why is the gap between therapists a whopping 4 years? (Associate degree vs. Masters degree) It makes the idea of getting a graduate degree and falling an extra $30,000 or more in debt seem a little less appealing now a days, especially in some settings when the gap in pay between the two might be negligible.

Regardless of why the gap in credentials so large, it can definitely create a rift between therapists. Say two 30 year old therapists work at the same clinic. One is a COTA with 10 years of experience, and one is a OTR with 6 years of experience. The only difference comes from the time it took both of them to finish school. When a parent calls and wants “whoever has the most experience.” I’ve seen an uncomfortable moment when the two might battle it out over which means more… education or actual years of practice.

As I’ve mentioned before, I think it takes a whole lot more than the letters after a name to make a therapist a good fit for a child. And for this reason I encourage parents to try to look past this as they find a therapist for their child. But on that same note, I know it’s hard not to feel a little defensive in this situation when you’re the therapist being judged.

-Straight Up Superiority Complexes
This can come in two forms. On one hand, some OTRs just want to exert their “power” and let a COTA know who is in charge. They might shoot down the COTA’s ideas and substitute them with their own. They might put the COTA on the spot and make them fight for their stance. They might just be plain ol’ mean and condescending. Sadly, I’ve seen all of these situations.

On the flip side, sometimes a COTA will want to put an OTR in their place due to the fact that they have been practicing for a much longer time. I mean, imagine being a COTA with 20 years of experience, only to have a new graduate OTR come in to your office and tell you what to do. Yeah, that can’t be fun.

-Unequal Caseload Expectations
Due to the extra paperwork responsibilities of an OTR, in some settings they have a lower caseload expectation. For example, a COTA might need to complete 35 hours of therapy a week and an OTR might have to complete 30. Even though the difference is justified by the additional responsibilities, this in and of itself can create a rift between the professionals, and a COTA might feel as if the expectations are unfair.

-Paperwork Battles
Since all of a COTA’s paperwork needs to be signed by an OTR, their “approval” of work can go down in many different ways. Sometimes it’s just looking over a document for grammatical errors and proper goal progression. Sometimes it’s an uncomfortable overhaul of an entire document. I know when I am reviewing a report of a COTA, I try to not put too much of my own preferences into their writing style. I might read a sentence and say, “that’s not how I would have said it,” but if the content is there, then I have learned to leave it alone. I’m not sure if every OTR feels this way.

-Disagreements over treatment progress
Sometimes there are just honest to goodness disagreements over the course of treatment. I might look at a set of goals that a COTA has for a client and ask, “why are you working on that?” With any therapist, I think it is important to be able to explain the reasoning behind your interventions versus just doing something that you’ve seen other people do. This has also been a learning process for me to accept that something isn’t automatically wrong just because it’s not the way I would do it.

 -A Lack of Any Relationship
Sometimes an OTR might never really interact with the COTA that they are supervising. They sign off on paperwork, but don’t have the time or resources to appropriately supervise a COTA. Granted, there are many COTA’s out there that don’t necessarily require that direct supervision, but by law, there needs to be some sort of processes in place to assure that proper supervision is happening.

From my experiences, the ideal OTR/COTA relationship consists of adequate face time together, and a sense of trust and mutual respect for two different professional opinions. When therapists actually work together, the families benefit so much more, and it can create a much happier and productive work environment.

Posted in Insider Information, Occupational Therapy | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Tested in Therapy: Ergonomic Stylus Review

Ergonomic Stylus Review

Let’s face it- tablets, iPads, smart phones… they are pretty much everywhere these days, even in the therapy world. While these gadgets are obviously the new normal, it is very important to remember the importance of good ol’ fashioned fine motor skill development. (A parent once told me that their school therapist said there was no reason to teach tasks with a pencil and paper, since kids would eventually only be using electronic devices. Whoa, now…)

Some tablet games are great for promoting pinch, finger isolation, and even visual motor integration. Of course, you can’t forget that the motivation for these activities is through the roof! However, I’ve found that one of the greatest things I can incorporate with the iPad is pencil grasp training using a stylus. Basically the ultimate in sneakiness.

Say a child refuses to do a writing task, but can’t wait to play a game on the iPad. Well, hand over a stylus, and magically they are practicing their pencil grasp. Plus, they don’t seem to mind corrections or adjustments as much when it comes to playing an app.

So when I was approached by The Pencil Grip to review their Ergonomic Stylus, I was more than happy to give it a go. (Full disclosure, they sent me the product to review for free, but this is in no way a sponsored review. Then I couldn’t be as brutally honest as I love…)

I thought I would put this product up against my regular stylus that I typically use with children in therapy. You can buy 3 of these generic ones for like $1.50 online. The Ergonomic Stylus retails for $12.99 on Amazon.

Stylus comparison

The first obvious difference is the thickness/weight of the Ergonomic Stylus. It has much more of a presence in your hand as you use it. Also seems much more official. This helped some children with proprioceptive and/or tactile issues have greater control of the pencil. Now, this isn’t a ton of weight, but I also liked it for a child that has a very mild intention tremor. He seemed to be more successful with this stylus in terms of control.

Many of my clients with autism preferred to grasp this stylus with a fisted grasp, and would maintain the proper position on the grip for only a few moments. I’m not sure if this had to do with the increased thickness of the stylus, or the grip itself. Just to be sure, I would switch between each stylus during a task, and sure enough, there was much more fisted grasping with the thicker stylus.

Now, if you are really looking for the adaptive positioning benefits of using The Pencil Grip, you can just slide that puppy on a regular stylus without a problem. When I did this, children focused a bit more on their grasp.

Stylus with grip

Another plus of the smaller stylus was that I could interchange different grips for different issues. One of my favorites being the CLAW grip, the one that most little fingers don’t slip out of quite as easily.

Stylus with CLAW grip

Overall, the Ergonomic Stylus might be a good choice for some of the older children that use a similar grip on their pencil successfully. Watch out for compensation while using the product, and as always, I would make sure to follow up with additional exercises and fine motor strengthening. Also, it might be a good choice for adults that do a lot of work on their tablets and need joint/pressure relief.

Posted in Pinterest Test Pins | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments